Quantcast

Bowling Green Today

Thursday, January 30, 2025

Rand Paul opposes drone bill citing privacy and civil liberty concerns

Webp kcduekee7k9nemxpjhwwgtl08qqi

Sen.Rand Paul - Ranking Member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committee | Official U.S. Senate headshot

Sen.Rand Paul - Ranking Member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committee | Official U.S. Senate headshot

U.S. Senator Rand Paul, representing Kentucky and serving as the Ranking Member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, addressed his concerns on the Senate floor regarding S. 1631. This bill proposes expanding federal surveillance powers related to intercepting communications and managing drone activities.

Senator Paul expressed strong reservations about this legislation, highlighting its potential impact on privacy rights, civil liberties, and Fourth Amendment protections against unwarranted searches. He questioned the urgency claimed by proponents of the bill, stating that "the government itself admits no such threat exists."

Federal agencies like the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI have reportedly indicated there is no immediate national security risk or public safety concern justifying such expanded powers. Despite these assurances, Senator Paul warned against hastily advancing legislation without thorough examination.

Reflecting on historical precedents such as the Patriot Act post-9/11, he noted how initial promises of temporary measures were later misused to infringe upon citizens' rights. He argued that "when Congress legislates in haste—without careful scrutiny...it is the American people who suffer."

Paul criticized provisions within S. 1631 that could allow for broad surveillance practices under claims of neutralizing drones, potentially affecting innocent individuals' privacy at airports. He described this as an example of "unchecked government overreach."

The senator emphasized Congress's duty to act as a check on executive power rather than endorsing it uncritically. He called for clear justification and safeguards before any new surveillance authority is granted, underscoring America's commitment to law over fear or panic.

In closing his remarks, Senator Paul firmly opposed moving forward with S. 1631 without further deliberation: "We do not trade away our freedoms...for vague promises of security."

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate

MORE NEWS